<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorry, Mozilla Broke That Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:53:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the-edmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7865</link>
		<dc:creator>the-edmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7865</guid>
		<description>Mozilla.org manages to screw up the UMO/AMO website every time they make a major change. When Firefox 1.0 was released in November 2004, UMO was closed to new extensions and updates for already listed extensions from like mid-December into March 2005 - fortunately The Extensions Mirror was a new a popular web site at that time and it was able to take up the &#039;slack&#039;, but now-a-days they don&#039;t deliver extensions that are listed at AMO - so we&#039;re SOL for all but the most esoteric.
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla.org manages to screw up the UMO/AMO website every time they make a major change. When Firefox 1.0 was released in November 2004, UMO was closed to new extensions and updates for already listed extensions from like mid-December into March 2005 &#8211; fortunately The Extensions Mirror was a new a popular web site at that time and it was able to take up the &#8217;slack&#8217;, but now-a-days they don&#8217;t deliver extensions that are listed at AMO &#8211; so we&#8217;re SOL for all but the most esoteric.<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7859</guid>
		<description>been gone quite a few weeks now ... the themes feed too ... hope they sort it out soon ... they&#039;re so useful rather than always checking back to the site ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>been gone quite a few weeks now &#8230; the themes feed too &#8230; hope they sort it out soon &#8230; they&#8217;re so useful rather than always checking back to the site &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7841</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Mozilla RSS extensions feed is dead also.  I can&#039;t see them leaving that gone for too long though.  Probably another thing that will come back as soon as they have the new layout and way of ding things finalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Mozilla RSS extensions feed is dead also.  I can&#8217;t see them leaving that gone for too long though.  Probably another thing that will come back as soon as they have the new layout and way of ding things finalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7839</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve lost RSS feeds for newest addons ... can&#039;t find them anywhere ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve lost RSS feeds for newest addons &#8230; can&#8217;t find them anywhere &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7837</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7837</guid>
		<description>Looks like things have been taken care of birdguy.  :)  Let me know though if you notice any other links not working and I will do my best to pass the word long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like things have been taken care of birdguy.  :)  Let me know though if you notice any other links not working and I will do my best to pass the word long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdguy</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>birdguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>This is crap, why would they want to get rid of extensions?  I can understand the old ones that are no longer updated but there are a lot of new ones that are missing too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crap, why would they want to get rid of extensions?  I can understand the old ones that are no longer updated but there are a lot of new ones that are missing too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Trashes Extensions? &#187; Mitchelaneous</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Trashes Extensions? &#187; Mitchelaneous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/03/26/sorry-mozilla-broke-that-link/#comment-7829</guid>
		<description>[...] have gotten a lot of people saying that some links on my Firefox blog, FirefoxFacts.com are broken now because of this. I&#8217;ll be doing my best trying to fix their mess and finding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have gotten a lot of people saying that some links on my Firefox blog, FirefoxFacts.com are broken now because of this. I&#8217;ll be doing my best trying to fix their mess and finding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
