<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch Out for that Extension!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:01:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sindhu</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>sindhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>well, i dont know about FasterFox because i could never really tell the difference. but i was little like ACK! when prior to reading this article came across the list. i like all the readers kept quiet.

that article is probably one payed heavily by advertisers. these addons help a user surf better and safer on the internet and whoever said they should be avoided is totally crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i dont know about FasterFox because i could never really tell the difference. but i was little like ACK! when prior to reading this article came across the list. i like all the readers kept quiet.</p>
<p>that article is probably one payed heavily by advertisers. these addons help a user surf better and safer on the internet and whoever said they should be avoided is totally crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sander85</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/#comment-8805</link>
		<dc:creator>sander85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/04/12/watch-out-for-that-extension/#comment-8805</guid>
		<description>well, i have to say most about fasterfox is WRONG i mean what they have written there. If you uncheck prefetching option it doesn&#039;t make you a problem for servers.. fasterfox thou is more demanding for servers in turbo mode but that because it uses more than normal pipes to download pictures and stuff from webpage.. if i remember right then normal is 8 pipes and turbo mode makes it 40 it&#039;s 5 times faster but you can see it only on fast connections 2Mbit/sec and more..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i have to say most about fasterfox is WRONG i mean what they have written there. If you uncheck prefetching option it doesn&#8217;t make you a problem for servers.. fasterfox thou is more demanding for servers in turbo mode but that because it uses more than normal pipes to download pictures and stuff from webpage.. if i remember right then normal is 8 pipes and turbo mode makes it 40 it&#8217;s 5 times faster but you can see it only on fast connections 2Mbit/sec and more..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
