<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greasemonkey Security Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:34:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/#comment-10449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/#comment-10449</guid>
		<description>Very interesting read indeed, thanks for the heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting read indeed, thanks for the heads up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Laird</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/#comment-10448</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Laird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2007/07/09/greasemonkey-security-issues/#comment-10448</guid>
		<description>This is scary indeed. It goes to show that we should view user scripts like .exe files - with great suspicion. I just wrote a blog entry on this issue that you might find interesting:

http://dev2dev.bea.com/blog/plaird/archive/2007/08/enterprise_grea.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is scary indeed. It goes to show that we should view user scripts like .exe files &#8211; with great suspicion. I just wrote a blog entry on this issue that you might find interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://dev2dev.bea.com/blog/plaird/archive/2007/08/enterprise_grea.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev2dev.bea.com/blog/plaird/archive/2007/08/enterprise_grea.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
