<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3&#8217;s About:Config Warning!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/18/firefox-3s-aboutconfig-warning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/18/firefox-3s-aboutconfig-warning/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:59:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catnip</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/18/firefox-3s-aboutconfig-warning/#comment-17204</link>
		<dc:creator>Catnip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/?p=1553#comment-17204</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s entertaining, yes, but I prefer the &quot;Here be dragons&quot; warning I heard about from the beta. 

At first, for a split second, I thought it was trying to tell me that messing with the config could mess up my computer itself, thus voiding the warranty. I immediatley jumped from that assumption to &quot;no, stupid, it&#039;s just a joke.&quot; 
But I&#039;ve seen other people seriously asking around online about whether using about:config would really void the warrenty on their system.

Maybe a different, yet still funny, message would cause less confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s entertaining, yes, but I prefer the &#8220;Here be dragons&#8221; warning I heard about from the beta. </p>
<p>At first, for a split second, I thought it was trying to tell me that messing with the config could mess up my computer itself, thus voiding the warranty. I immediatley jumped from that assumption to &#8220;no, stupid, it&#8217;s just a joke.&#8221;<br />
But I&#8217;ve seen other people seriously asking around online about whether using about:config would really void the warrenty on their system.</p>
<p>Maybe a different, yet still funny, message would cause less confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/18/firefox-3s-aboutconfig-warning/#comment-14810</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/?p=1553#comment-14810</guid>
		<description>The people who think Firefox has a warranty are exactly the people you don&#039;t want messing with about:config so I thought it was brilliant as well as damned funny :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who think Firefox has a warranty are exactly the people you don&#8217;t want messing with about:config so I thought it was brilliant as well as damned funny :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Soares</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/05/18/firefox-3s-aboutconfig-warning/#comment-14749</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Soares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/?p=1553#comment-14749</guid>
		<description>There are others, like when you enter a site with an expired certificate there is a button saying &quot;Get me out of here!&quot;

Not to mention the about:robots page

hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are others, like when you enter a site with an expired certificate there is a button saying &#8220;Get me out of here!&#8221;</p>
<p>Not to mention the about:robots page</p>
<p>hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
