<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Pick Adobe, Go with Nodobe!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:37:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-22033</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-22033</guid>
		<description>I dislike access to whatever document to be tightened to a browser. And Adobe Reader -- amongst alternatives -- works just fine here, even if in its lite version. My computer is a PC and it will never be a workstation otherwise than workstation as opposed to server. Moreover, there may be confidential information in data, and I hate confidential data flying over the seven skies of the Web, otherwise than strongly encrypted. So no to Nodobe, but thanks for mentioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dislike access to whatever document to be tightened to a browser. And Adobe Reader &#8212; amongst alternatives &#8212; works just fine here, even if in its lite version. My computer is a PC and it will never be a workstation otherwise than workstation as opposed to server. Moreover, there may be confidential information in data, and I hate confidential data flying over the seven skies of the Web, otherwise than strongly encrypted. So no to Nodobe, but thanks for mentioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-21314</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-21314</guid>
		<description>Looks like the conversion is done on Vuzit&#039;s server and a username/logon is required.  A nice idea but I think I&#039;ll pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the conversion is done on Vuzit&#8217;s server and a username/logon is required.  A nice idea but I think I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-21221</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/10/05/dont-pick-adobe-go-with-nodobe/#comment-21221</guid>
		<description>I should try this. (Although the logo is ugly.)

Thanks, Mitch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should try this. (Although the logo is ugly.)</p>
<p>Thanks, Mitch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
