<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.1 May be Delayed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:42:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TMUkmkd</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-30439</link>
		<dc:creator>TMUkmkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-30439</guid>
		<description>i suggest.. better bit late..then we got something just like vista.. after several month, replace with another one.. please.. I don&#039;t like that situation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suggest.. better bit late..then we got something just like vista.. after several month, replace with another one.. please.. I don&#39;t like that situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25440</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25440</guid>
		<description>3.1 Beta 3 will be released by March 12th.

However after that, 3.1 is being renumbered to 3.5 and 3.5 Beta 4 will be out in April and then the final 3.5 release will be in Q2 2009.

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.1 Beta 3 will be released by March 12th.</p>
<p>However after that, 3.1 is being renumbered to 3.5 and 3.5 Beta 4 will be out in April and then the final 3.5 release will be in Q2 2009.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMUkmkd</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25280</link>
		<dc:creator>TMUkmkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25280</guid>
		<description>i mean, if they want to release in rush mode, then FF 3.1 will be like Vista.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i mean, if they want to release in rush mode, then FF 3.1 will be like Vista.. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMUkmkd</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25279</link>
		<dc:creator>TMUkmkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25279</guid>
		<description>i suggest.. better bit late..then we got something just like vista.. after several month, replace with another one.. please.. I don&#039;t like that situation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i suggest.. better bit late..then we got something just like vista.. after several month, replace with another one.. please.. I don&#8217;t like that situation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WesllyOni</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25230</link>
		<dc:creator>WesllyOni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25230</guid>
		<description>I agree with almost everyone here, I prefer to wait in order to have a nice final product and my shining tracemonkey flying through Gmail JUST when Mozilla thinks the time is right.

I can wait 1 month, maybe 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with almost everyone here, I prefer to wait in order to have a nice final product and my shining tracemonkey flying through Gmail JUST when Mozilla thinks the time is right.</p>
<p>I can wait 1 month, maybe 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takarii</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25229</link>
		<dc:creator>Takarii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25229</guid>
		<description>If people want Firefox 3.1 so desperately they can simply use the beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people want Firefox 3.1 so desperately they can simply use the beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excentric</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25228</link>
		<dc:creator>excentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25228</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Get it right, then release it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Get it right, then release it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25225</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/02/25/firefox-31-may-be-delayed/#comment-25225</guid>
		<description>They should stay on track and get it done properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should stay on track and get it done properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
