<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foxmarks is Dropping the Fox (Xmarks Review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/</link>
	<description>Firefox tips, extensions, links and help!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:33:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Naoise</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-26119</link>
		<dc:creator>Naoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-26119</guid>
		<description>I am sad to see that another good addon is converted into a revenue business (CoolIris could be another example). If I&#039;d want these capabilities I would install another lightweight addon that would work with Foxmarks.

I rather wait until another Foxmarks comes out than &quot;upgrading&quot; to Xmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sad to see that another good addon is converted into a revenue business (CoolIris could be another example). If I&#8217;d want these capabilities I would install another lightweight addon that would work with Foxmarks.</p>
<p>I rather wait until another Foxmarks comes out than &#8220;upgrading&#8221; to Xmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Komoly</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25726</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Komoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25726</guid>
		<description>I wish you&#039;d correct the existing problems first: every time I sync, my bookmarks get jumbled up from alphabetically sorted to random. And there seems to be no facility to determine which of two (or more) computers can be the &#039;master&#039; one if there&#039;s conflict (which there would be, once you organize your bookmarks on any one of them).
Any answers please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you&#8217;d correct the existing problems first: every time I sync, my bookmarks get jumbled up from alphabetically sorted to random. And there seems to be no facility to determine which of two (or more) computers can be the &#8216;master&#8217; one if there&#8217;s conflict (which there would be, once you organize your bookmarks on any one of them).<br />
Any answers please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25385</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25385</guid>
		<description>I like it just the way it is.  Don&#039;t need or want or will use any of that other stuff.  Just want the bookmarks on my two computers to match.  Just want a simple little program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it just the way it is.  Don&#8217;t need or want or will use any of that other stuff.  Just want the bookmarks on my two computers to match.  Just want a simple little program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hangfromthefloor</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25374</link>
		<dc:creator>hangfromthefloor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25374</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but Foxmarks is just dropping the &quot;Fo&quot;; the &quot;x&quot; is still there. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but Foxmarks is just dropping the &#8220;Fo&#8221;; the &#8220;x&#8221; is still there. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25370</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/03/02/foxmarks-is-dropping-the-fox-xmarks-review/#comment-25370</guid>
		<description>Fat lot of good this will do for us in Canada when we can&#039;t see some of the stuff up here.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat lot of good this will do for us in Canada when we can&#8217;t see some of the stuff up here&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
