<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Firefox Facts &#187; anti-phishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/tag/anti-phishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com</link>
	<description>best guide to add-ons, themes and tips for Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Winning Anti-Phishing War</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/11/16/mozilla-winning-anti-phishing-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/11/16/mozilla-winning-anti-phishing-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/11/16/mozilla-winning-anti-phishing-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the folks at Mozilla are taking a bite out of crime phishing. Personally I don&#8217;t care too much for phish. I am a bigger fan of phicken. The Washington Post announced today the availability of a new report by consulting firm SmartWare on Firefox 2 and Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 anti-phishing features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the folks at Mozilla are taking a bite out of <strike>crime</strike> phishing.  Personally I don&#8217;t care too much for phish.  I am a bigger fan of phicken.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Washington Post announced today the availability of a new report by consulting firm SmartWare on Firefox 2 and Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 anti-phishing features comparison. The bottom line: &#8220;Firefox 2 Phishing Protection is more effective than the Microsoft Phishing Filter in Internet Explorer 7.&#8221; Numbers are shown below and based on 1040 tested known phishing web sites.</p></blockquote>
<p>+ <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/11/mozilla-on-anti-phishing-we-are-winning/">Read More About Mozilla Winning the War Against Phishing!</a></p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/11/16/mozilla-winning-anti-phishing-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Firefox 2.0 a Google Mole?</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/06/01/is-firefox-20-a-google-mole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/06/01/is-firefox-20-a-google-mole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken-little]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/06/01/is-firefox-20-a-google-mole/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right off the bat, I think this is a little silly and playing a little too much chicken little. In Firefox 2, Google&#8217;s new &#8220;safe browsing&#8221; features seem to have more than a few folks ticked off. Why? It is because Google will control the list of Web sites that may be &#8220;miscreants&#8221;. So we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right off the bat, I think this is a little silly and playing a little <a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/6756">too much chicken little</a>.  In Firefox 2, Google&#8217;s new &#8220;safe browsing&#8221; features seem to have more than a few folks ticked off.  Why?  It is because Google will control the list of Web sites that may be &#8220;miscreants&#8221;.  So we want fixes to the problem, but we don&#8217;t want one person to be solving the problem?  This is like calling a plumber to fix a leak and telling him to bring three or four buddies to make sure he did his job right.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.threadwatch.org/node/6756">Threadwatch.org - Is Firefox 2.0 a Google Mole?</a>]</p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/06/01/is-firefox-20-a-google-mole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

