<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Firefox Facts &#187; bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/tag/bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com</link>
	<description>best guide to add-ons, themes and tips for Firefox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Use the Home Button?</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/08/13/do-you-use-the-home-button/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/08/13/do-you-use-the-home-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/?p=4264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a very simple question for you this Friday.  Do you still use the home button in Firefox, or have you eliminated it to save yourself a little more browsing room? According to a recent study on the navigational hot spots within Firefox, Home is still ranks 37.6% as far as the most popular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;" title="Firefox Home Button" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/home.png" border="0" alt="Firefox Home Button" width="60" height="54" align="left" />I have a very simple question for you this Friday.  Do you still use the home button in Firefox, or have you eliminated it to save yourself a little more browsing room? According to a <a href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/08/04/top-10-firefox-navigation-hotspots/" target="_blank">recent study</a> on the navigational hot spots within Firefox, Home is still ranks 37.6% as far as the most popular interface features go.</p>
<p>So leave your thoughts in the comments.  Is the home button still relevant in your day to day browsing, or have you ditched it?</p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/08/13/do-you-use-the-home-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Ugliest Firefox Themes</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/07/16/ugly-firefox-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/07/16/ugly-firefox-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flamingo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glowy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unusable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/?p=4048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From time to time, I like to share with you some of the ugliest popular themes I can find for Firefox.  These three themes though might be the cream of the crop when it comes to just plain bad themes.  Then again, I will let you be the judge.  Is beauty in the eye of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px;" title="Warning - Ugly Themes Ahead" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/uglythemes.jpg" border="0" alt="Warning - Ugly Themes Ahead" width="500" height="194" /></p>
<p>From time to time, I like to share with you some of the ugliest popular themes I can find for Firefox.  These three themes though might be the cream of the crop when it comes to just plain bad themes.  Then again, I will let you be the judge.  Is beauty in the eye of the beholder &#8211; or are these themes just unusable?</p>
<p><span id="more-4048"></span></p>
<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px;" title="Bloodfire 3" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/bloodfire.png" border="0" alt="Bloodfire 3" width="504" height="280" /></p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/z/en-US/firefox/addon/10946/"><strong>BloodFire 3</strong></a> &#8211; This theme is named like a bad horror movie that went straight to DVD.  The black backgrounds, with red fonts and buttons can&#8217;t be good for your eyes either, can it?</p>
<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px;" title="Flaminglow" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/flamingos.jpg" border="0" alt="Flaminglow" width="504" height="347" /></p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9791/"><strong>Flaminglow</strong></a> &#8211; What happens when you mix Pepto-Bismol, flamingos and a Firefox theme? You get Flaminglow.  Even the theme&#8217;s creator knows he will get hate mail for this one, because he writes on the download page for the theme in question, &#8220;Please do not give me a bad review if you find unreadable text&#8221;.  I am pretty sure that is a good reason to give you a bad review. The unreadable text is only the beginning however.</p>
<p><img style="display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px;" title="Glowywine" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/glowytheme.jpg" border="0" alt="Glowywine" width="504" height="337" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/11/11/like-staying-in-a-cheap-las-vegas-casino-glowy-themes/"><strong>Glowywine</strong></a> &#8211; Ever wanted to make using a web browser less of an fun experience and, well &#8211; more like staying at the sleaziest Las Vegas casino you could find? The funniest thing I could bring up about this theme is it features a review that says, &#8220;Highly usable. Easy on the eyes.&#8221;  Really? Easy on the eyes?</p>
<p><em>Leave your thoughts in the comments.  Want to defend one of these themes, or have you found one that looks even worse?</em></p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2010/07/16/ugly-firefox-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lolifox Theme Just Makes Me Angry at the World</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/04/08/lolifox-theme-just-makes-me-angry-at-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/04/08/lolifox-theme-just-makes-me-angry-at-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creepy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lolifox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/04/08/lolifox-theme-just-makes-me-angry-at-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I am not one to usually fight the Firefox community, but this just kind of take the cake for being totally absurd.&#160; How in the heck does the Lolifox by ChaosRing Theme have these kind of download numbers? 5,982 weekly downloads 6,327 total downloads Just look at it!&#160; All they did was take the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="lolifox-theme" style="border-top-width: 0px; display: inline; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 5px; border-right-width: 0px" height="219" alt="lolifox-theme" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/lolifoxtheme.png" width="182" align="right" border="0" /> Now I am not one to usually fight the Firefox community, but this just kind of take the cake for being totally absurd.&#160; How in the heck does the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/11186">Lolifox by ChaosRing Theme</a> have these kind of download numbers?</p>
<ul>
<li>5,982 weekly downloads </li>
<li>6,327 total downloads </li>
</ul>
<p>Just look at it!&#160; All they did was take the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4517">CrystalFox Modern</a> theme and put a creepy picture of a fox-child-thing on it and make the background bright green.&#160; </p>
<p>This ugly theme does bring up one good point, which is – what is Mozilla’s policy when somebody openly steals another person’s theme or design?</p>
<p>Now sure, there might be some other not-so-great looking themes out there however they have their audiences, so you have to respect that.&#160; On the other hand though, the Lolifox theme is the worst theme I have seen in a very long time. </p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2009/04/08/lolifox-theme-just-makes-me-angry-at-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Firefox Features Could You Do Without?</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/11/14/what-firefox-features-could-you-do-without/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/11/14/what-firefox-features-could-you-do-without/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/11/14/what-firefox-features-could-you-do-without/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody and their grandmother has done a list of Firefox features you would like to see come to the browser, but what features could you do without?&#160; There is no doubt that fans of Firefox like a light browsing experience, so could Firefox do with a little house cleaning of features not used or loved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 5px 0px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="195" alt="firefox features" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/firefox.jpg" width="201" align="left" border="0"> Everybody and their grandmother has done a list of Firefox features you would like to see come to the browser, but what features could you do without?&nbsp; There is no doubt that fans of Firefox like a light browsing experience, so could Firefox do with a little house cleaning of features not used or loved by many?&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/07/23/security-zone-policy-errors-in-firefox-3/"><strong>Security Zone Policy Errors</strong></a> &#8211; This seems to be more of a problem than most people realize.&nbsp; From this <a href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/07/23/security-zone-policy-errors-in-firefox-3/">one blog post</a>, I see people coming in every day having issues with it.&nbsp; So, should Firefox be relying on Windows security settings for downloading applications and other potentially unsafe files from the Internet?</p>
<p><strong>Descriptions for Bookmarks</strong> &#8211; Have you ever right-clicked a bookmark, Went down to properties and typed in a description about a page you had saved?&nbsp; No, I haven&#8217;t either &#8211; so this might be another Firefox feature ready for the junk yard.&nbsp; Name, Location, and Keyword is good enough for me.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Now it is your turn, what Firefox feature could you live without?</strong></p>
<p><u><strong><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="51" alt="intensedebate-logo" src="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/intensedebate-logo.png" width="150" align="right" border="0"> Firefox Facts Bonus!</strong></u>&nbsp; This morning I installed <a href="http://www.intensedebate.com/">Intense Debate</a> for <a href="http://www.firefoxfacts.com/">FirefoxFacts.com</a>.&nbsp; I am really excited to see how much better this makes the commenting system here on the web site.&nbsp; No registration in necessary, but if you do &#8211; there are some cool extra features you will get, such as reputation points, comment voting, and tons of other cool things.&nbsp; (<a href="http://intensedebate.com/features">Learn More!</a>)</p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2008/11/14/what-firefox-features-could-you-do-without/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100 Worst Firefox Extensions</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/10/17/100-worst-firefox-extensions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/10/17/100-worst-firefox-extensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/10/17/100-worst-firefox-extensions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I have always heard that there is no such thing as a bad idea. No matter if you think that is the case or not, there are more than a few bad Firefox extensions. Now I do not mean bad as in they will hurt you, I mean bad as in they are pretty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have always heard that there is no such thing as a bad idea.  No matter if you think that is the case or not, there are more than a few bad Firefox extensions.  Now I do not mean bad as in they will hurt you, I mean bad as in they are pretty lame ideas.  So let us celebrate these bad ideas all at once, with the 100 worst Firefox extensions.</p>
<p>+ <a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Worst_100_Firefox_extensions">Did Your Favorites Make the List?</a></p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/10/17/100-worst-firefox-extensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Block the Naughty Words</title>
		<link>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/07/30/block-the-naughty-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/07/30/block-the-naughty-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Greasemonkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naughty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[userscripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/07/30/block-the-naughty-words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few four letter words got you down? I do not think you will have to worry about it on this Web site, but on others you might have a problem with curse words getting on your screen. If this happens to you and you don&#8217;t want it to, you need the Profanity Filter! This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few four letter words got you down?  I do not think you will have to worry about it on this Web site, but on others you might have a problem with curse words getting on your screen.  If this happens to you and you don&#8217;t want it to, you need the Profanity Filter! This script filters profanity from Web sites. </p>
<p>To use this script you <strong>must have <a href="http://greasemonkey.mozdev.org/">Greasemonkey</a> for Firefox installed</strong>.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/4175">Learn More About the Profanity Filter!</a>] </p>
                                                                                <strong>Facebook Fan Page</strong>  Come join the fun on the Firefox Facts <a href="http://www.facebook.com/MitchProjects">Facebook Fan Page</a>!</a><br />
<br />
&copy; <a href="http://www.mitchkeeler.com">Mitch Keeler</a> 2011 | Check out my <a href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com">personal blog</a> and my <a href="http://www.webhostingshow.com">hosting podcast</a> too!</a><br />
<br>&nbsp;                                                ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firefoxfacts.com/2006/07/30/block-the-naughty-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

